This page compares Hirdman with showcase vendors and lists 26 questions to ask any breach monitoring vendor, with our answer to each.
During an attack surface review we found two subdomains running a UI development tool. The version was vulnerable to information disclosure: an environment file ended up in the public build, along with access tokens for repositories, cloud roles, databases and storage.
There was no leaked email or password for the domain, so breach monitoring would have shown nothing. The CVSS score rated the flaw "low" (3.1), but the file held working keys. We confirmed one token by accessing a repository, and gave the client all compromised secrets for rotation.
| Criterion | Showcase vendor | Us | Why it matters to the client |
|---|
| No. | Question | Red flag | Our answer |
|---|
Red flags: typical answers from showcase vendors, not a description of any specific vendor.
A free check of your current vendor: we show the difference live, with no obligation.